|
Structure
Process - Spring 2004-Spring 2005
Consultation - Spring 2004 - September 2004
Materials mailed April 20, 2004 to Regional Community
Presidents and school principals and presidents (where
applicable) included a “preferred model” and a process for
local discussion and Provisional Area
Discussion.
Included - Compelling Reasons and Criteria for Model stated.
1. Mercy schools remain Catholic schools,
faithful to the mission of the Church.
2. The charism of Catherine McAuley and Mercy
core values and tradition continue in the ministry of Mercy
secondary and elementary education. As works of Mercy, Mercy
schools continue to meet an enduring need and provide a
means to ensure that the charism of Catherine McAuley is
sustained in a manner consistent with her“ compassionate
presence” and timeless mission to “make some lasting
efforts.”
3. In new structures for Mercy education:
o
Strengthen mission
o
Preserve the relationship of the congregation
into the future for these sacred ministries
o
Stabilize Mercy education - increasing
sustainability while providing for accountability with a
focus on works of Mercy education.
o
Help position Mercy schools so that they
might endure as works of Mercy.
o
Provide support for all, especially those in
need, as current bonds are strengthened and new bonds of
relationship are developed
4. Lay Leadership and partnership among
co-ministers in Mercy
o
Affirm that the future will be characterized
by partnerships among lay and religious colleagues.
o
Promote inclusiveness, unity and solid
partnerships between and among lay and religious colleagues.
o
In shared governance for Mercy schools
strengthen leadership into the future.
5. Respect
o
Offer common simplicity, clarity of roles
o
Honor local autonomy and the principle of
subsidiarity
6. Provide supportive services:
o
For ongoing education and formation in the
core values, tradition.
o
For assessment and accountability processes.
o
For leadership identification and ongoing
education and formation (for current and emerging roles)
o
For collaborative programs
Celebrate: a “unified structure” - a
structure which supports the criteria sought and commitment
to the charism of Catherine McAuley, Mercy core values and
tradition as the unifying components for Mercy schools
October 2004
October 22, 2004 from 10:00 – 12:30 - large group
consultation in Buffalo , New York
. Part of the October 22 agenda included a working session to review
current roles and responsibilities for sponsors and boards
and current board profiles vis-à-vis the future. It included
a report on the land and property issues identified thus
far.
October - December 2004
·
To present a summary report of the responses from Regional
Communities on the model
·
To present potential next steps for moving forward;
·
To answer participant's questions.
February, 2005
- 8 page document including cover letter, model and proposal
with supporting information mailed to ILT, Regional
Community Leadership, and school leadership.
March/April 2005
- Dialogue about model of sponsorship at the local, regional
community and Area level. Presentation by the Network at the
ILC meeting April 23, 2005 |